Controversies and misconceptions/Why No One Has Measured The Speed Of Light
Why No One Has Measured The Speed Of Light

Why No One Has Measured The Speed Of Light

Veritasium19 minOct 31, 2020
7 chapters
  • The Speed of Light Definition and Paradox(0'001'47)
    Since 1983, the speed of light has been exactly 299,792,458 meters per second, and this value is used to define how long a meter is. A meter is the distance light travels in a vacuum in 1/299,792,458ths of a second.
    Despite the precise definition, light may never actually travel at this speed because no one has actually measured the one-way speed of light. We can only measure the round-trip speed.
    To measure speed, you need distance and time. With light, you cannot measure these the same way you measure other objects because you cannot observe light at both the start and end points simultaneously.
    Hippolyte Fizeau measured the speed of light in 1849 using a spinning gear and mirror method, obtaining 313,000 kilometers per second, which is within 5% of the accepted value.
  • The Clock Synchronization Problem(1'474'07)
    To measure the one-way speed of light, you need two synchronized clocks—one at the laser source and one at the endpoint. However, synchronizing them is impossible without already knowing the speed of light.
    • Connecting clocks via wire creates a time delay equal to light travel time, which is what you're trying to measure • Moving clocks together and syncing them, then transporting one clock, causes time dilation due to special relativity • The moved clock will no longer be synchronized with the stationary one
    Using a single clock at the start and placing a mirror at the end allows measuring the full round-trip time. This method can measure the two-way speed but not the one-way speed.
    The only experimentally measurable quantity is the round-trip speed of light, as light bounces off a mirror and returns to the starting point.
  • Alternative Possibilities for Light Speed(4'076'28)
    The speed of light could theoretically be different in one direction than in the opposite direction. For example, light could travel at c/2 in one direction and instantaneously in the other direction.
    • A signal to Mars takes 20 minutes round trip • Standard assumption: 10 minutes each way • Alternative possibility: all 20 minutes one way, instantaneous return • Both scenarios produce identical observations and communication delays
    Physicists have developed internally consistent theories where light speed varies by direction, ranging from a few percent variation to c/2 one way and infinite speed the other way.
    There could be a preferred direction through spacetime, similar to how the universe shows matter-antimatter asymmetry.
  • Einstein's Convention and Its Implications(6'288'57)
    Einstein's 1905 paper established that the speed of light is the same in opposite directions not as a physical law but as a definition—the Einstein synchronization convention—to establish simultaneity.
    Einstein emphasized 'by definition' in italics in his paper, clarifying that assuming equal two-way light speed is a stipulation chosen freely to define simultaneity, not a hypothesis about light's nature.
    Physics works identically whether light travels at c in all directions or at c/2 one way and instantaneously the other way, as long as the round-trip speed is c. No physical laws break under alternative conventions.
    • The convention is necessary to synchronize clocks at different locations • It defines what 'simultaneous' means across space • Occam's razor suggests equal speed is simpler, but this is philosophical, not experimental
  • Failed Attempts to Measure One-Way Speed(8'5711'25)
    Using a trillion-frame-per-second camera to see light passing through an object fails because you observe both the light passing through and bouncing back to the camera, measuring the round-trip speed.
    Using 186,000 miles of fiber optic cable fails because the cable loops around, creating multiple round trips where light travels faster in one direction and slower in the other, averaging to c.
    Sending simultaneous pulses from a central device to two clocks fails because if light speed differs by direction, one clock becomes offset by exactly the right amount to always measure c as the speed.
    Moving synchronized clocks apart with equal and opposite speeds fails because if light speed depends on direction, then time dilation also depends on direction, breaking the synchronization.
  • The Circular Problem and Its Reality(11'2514'34)
    You need synchronized clocks to measure the one-way speed of light, but you need to know the one-way speed of light to synchronize clocks. This is a logical loop with no escape.
    • If Earth sends a message at noon saying it was sent at 12:00, the roundtrip delay is 20 minutes • Mark on Mars assumes the signal took 10 minutes, setting his clock to 12:10 • But if light is actually c/2 from Earth to Mars and instantaneous returning, Mark's clock is 10 minutes behind
    The out-of-sync clocks cannot be detected or corrected because both observers measure the same time delays and experience identical communication patterns.
    GPS systems and all other synchronization methods inherently assume light travels at c in all directions, making alternative conventions undetectable even if true.
  • Philosophical Implications and Future Physics(14'3419'04)
    The round-trip speed of light is c, but the one-way speed may have no well-defined value, challenging our understanding of simultaneity and whether 'right now' has meaning across distances.
    • If c/2 one way and instantaneous returning: Mark sees Earth as it was 20 minutes ago • Earth sees Mars exactly as it is right now • You could see distant stars not as they were centuries ago, but as they are this instant
    Most working physicists accept the convention and move on, but physicists have debated this since 1905. It's important to recognize the one-way speed is a convention, not an empirically verified fact.
    Our inability to measure the one-way speed of light may be a fundamental clue about how General Relativity, Quantum Mechanics, space, and time are all connected when physics undergoes its next paradigmatic leap.