
How a Student's Question Saved This NYC Skyscraper
11 capitulos
- The Discovery of a Fatal FlawThe CrisisStructural engineer Bill LeMessurier discovered that Citicorp Center, open for less than a year, had a fatal flaw that could cause it to collapse in winds of just 110 kilometers per hour.The Stakes• Over 200,000 people lived and worked in the surrounding area • Hurricane season was only weeks away • LeMessurier was the only person in the world who knew about the dangerThe DilemmaLeMessurier faced a choice between staying silent and hoping for the best, or attempting to fix it and risking professional ruin and mass panic.The ChallengeCiticorp Center had a 100% probability of total collapse by the end of the century, making the question of how to save New York from a near certain disaster urgent.
- Building an Engineering MarvelThe ConstraintCiticorp wanted to build headquarters on a city block, but the land was partially occupied by Saint Peter's Church, whose pastor refused to leave and demanded the church have its own separate identity.The Design Solution• Replace the old gothic church with a brand new one • Make the church physically distinct from the new tower • Keep two-thirds of the space above the church free and openThe InnovationEngineer LeMessurier proposed an unconventional solution: notch out all four corners of the tower and construct the skyscraper on stilts, which was probably the first time an engineer asked an architect to make their job harder.The StructureThe stilts would support at least half the building's gravity load while a larger central column held the rest. The stilts would be positioned at the center of each face, not at the corners, creating an engineering challenge.
- The Chevron Bracing SystemThe Flash of InsightLeMessurier sketched out an idea on a napkin: six layers of diagonal braces up each face of the tower that would transfer forces to the middle of each face and down to the stilts.How It Works• Gravity loads come down the column and are forced into the braces by removing columns at strategic points • Every eight stories, half the gravity load is forced through the chevrons to the midface columns • This system was entirely unique, driven by the placement of the columns and building conditionsWind ResistanceThe chevron bracing transfers wind loads that accumulate as they travel down the building. Unlike ordinary structures with corner columns, this design channels horizontal forces through the diagonal braces in a wrapping pattern.Practical ChallengeThe chevron braces were massive, almost 40 meters long end to end. They were fabricated in pieces and welded together on site since they could not be transported through Manhattan as single units.
- The Tuned Mass Damper SolutionThe ProblemThe lightweight chevron bracing system made the building swayable in the wind. While not necessarily a structural problem, it could be uncomfortable for occupants.The InnovationLeMessurier adopted a tuned mass damper (TMD), a system previously used only in bridges, power lines, and ships. He used a 400-ton concrete mass on the top floor, affectionately known as 'the great block of cheese.'How It Stabilizes• As the building sways to one side, the concrete mass moves in the same direction • Energy is dissipated through viscous dampers as the mass oscillates out of phase with the building • The system reduces swaying amplitude by roughly 50%The BenefitThe damper saved approximately $4 million by eliminating the need for an additional 2,800 tons of structural steel while maintaining the elegant design.
- The Bolts vs Welds DiscoveryThe ConversationIn May 1978, while discussing a similar project, a contractor and architect asked LeMessurier how the welded chevron braces worked out. LeMessurier called his New York office and discovered the braces had been bolted instead of welded.The DecisionThe contractor had suggested saving a quarter million dollars by using bolts instead of welds. LeMessurier's firm agreed without reviewing the critical implications.The Initial LogicSince gravity loads compress the braces, some chevrons only go into tension under very high winds. LeMessurier trusted his team's calculations that bolts were adequate for these lower-tension scenarios.The Question TriggerAbout a month later, a student called LeMessurier with questions about the building. A professor claimed LeMessurier's column placement was wrong. This conversation sparked LeMessurier to reconsider wind loads from all directions.
- Quartering Winds AnalysisThe RealizationWhile working on a triangular hotel building, LeMessurier began analyzing what happens when wind hits a corner instead of straight on the face. These quartering winds revealed a critical oversight.The Mathematics• Wind is split into perpendicular components hitting each side • Each side receives force divided by the square root of two • The diagonal braces experience double the force compared to perpendicular wind calculations • Total stress increase of 40% over original calculationsThe Critical FlawThe original bolted connections were calculated assuming wind hitting straight on the building face. The firm had not considered quartering winds, which was critical since bolts cannot handle the increased tension that welded connections could manage.The HorrorLooking at the actual joint requirements, braces that needed only 4 bolts now required 10 bolts. With incorrect safety factors applied, the actual requirement was 14 bolts, but only 4 had been installed.
- Wind Tunnel Verification and ProbabilityThe ConsultationLeMessurier flew to Canada to verify his calculations with Alan Davenport at the Boundary Layer Wind Tunnel. The results showed the situation was even worse than his static analysis indicated.The Dynamic Analysis• Static calculations showed 40% increase in stress • Dynamic analysis revealed stresses could increase up to 60% when the building sways • The weakest joints were at the 30th floor where failure would cause total collapseThe OddsOn average, a storm strong enough to tear the building apart occurred every 67 years if the tuned mass damper was working. If a storm knocked out power, even 110 km/h winds for five minutes would collapse the building, with a 1 in 16 annual probability.The TimingHurricane Belle had passed through New York just one year before, with wind gusts of 110 kilometers per hour. A similar storm hitting during the upcoming hurricane season could be catastrophic.
- The Decision to ActThe TemptationLeMessurier considered disappearing or driving intentionally off the Maine Turnpike into a bridge abutment. In a later interview he admitted these dark thoughts during the crisis.The Moral ChoiceWith a 1 in 16 chance of collapse that fall and thousands of lives at risk, LeMessurier recognized there was never any choice but to act.The Disclosure• LeMessurier consulted with lawyers and engineering experts • He informed architect Hugh Stubbins • Together they told Citicorp chairman Walter Wriston • Emergency generators were acquired for the tuned mass damper within hoursThe PlanLeMessurier called the repair plan Project Serene (Special Engineering Review of Events Nobody Envisioned) to avoid the ominous sound of Project Pandora.
- Project Serene - The Secret RepairsThe Method• Each night, welders would enter after workers left • They removed sheet rock around chevron beams • Welded two 5-centimeter thick, 2-meter long steel plates on each joint as reinforcement • Replaced walls and cleaned up before morning workers arrivedThe ScopeOver 200 joints needed welding. LeMessurier ranked them by importance, starting with the 30th floor joints, the most critical to prevent collapse.The RiskRepairs would not be completed before hurricane season. Citicorp worked with the Red Cross to develop a 10-block evacuation plan affecting thousands of people in and around the building.The Secrecy• Decision made not to tell the public or office workers • Strain gauges installed on structural members monitored from 8 blocks away • AT&T president personally installed emergency telephone lines overnight for communication
- Hurricane Season and The Press BlackoutThe Media PressureWhen The New York Times tried to reach LeMessurier for comment, he was about to call them when they announced a strike at 6 p.m. All New York newspapers went on strike until October, providing perfect cover for the repairs.The Storm Threat• Hurricane Ella began brewing in the Caribbean in late August • By Friday, September 1st, Ella approached with winds reaching 200 km/h • City officials prepared 10-block evacuation with door-to-door police deployment • Repairs were only halfway completeThe Close CallFor 24 tense hours, Hurricane Ella stalled near North Carolina. LeMessurier and the team were 'sweating blood.' At the last minute, the hurricane veered off into the sea, intensified, and hit Canada with 225 km/h winds.The ReliefRepairs were completed in October, just six weeks after LeMessurier told Citicorp about the crisis. The building could now withstand a one in 1000-year storm.
- Legacy and the Mystery StudentThe Secrecy BreaksFor nearly two decades, Project Serene remained secret. In 1995, The New Yorker published the full story, bringing LeMessurier praise rather than vilification for owning up and fixing the mistake immediately.The Impact• New York updated building codes to require quartering wind calculations • Tuned mass dampers have spread globally across buildings • Six of the 20 tallest buildings in the world now use TMDs • Taipei 101 uses a 660-ton pendulum damper for typhoon and earthquake resistanceThe Student Identity• Initially believed to be Diane Hartley, a Princeton engineering student studying Citicorp for her thesis • In 2011, Lee DeCarolis from the New Jersey Institute of Technology came forward claiming to be the caller • Sadly, LeMessurier died in 2007 before confirming the student's identityEnduring Questions• LeMessurier Associates refuses to discuss the repairs or acknowledge mistakes • Boston Properties (current owner, renamed 601 Lexington) refused filming access or comment • A 2021 NIST study revisited quartering winds analysis without complete internal structural details • The case remains controversial despite being taught as a model of engineering ethics worldwide





